LONDON (AFP) – The ex-wife of a Nigerian oil tycoon on Wednesday won
a lengthy court battle in Britain for properties he owned worth
millions of pounds, in a Supreme Court ruling with significant
implications for divorcing couples.
Lawyers for Michael Prest had claimed the properties were not his to
hand over because they were legally owned by companies in his Petrodel
group.
But seven judges at the Supreme Court, the highest court in the land,
ruled unanimously in favour of his English wife Yasmin, who he married
in 1993 and divorced in 2011.
They found the disputed properties were held on trust for Michael
Prest and he was “beneficially entitled” to them, and as such they were
eligible to be transferred to his ex-wife.
Yasmin Prest said she was “delighted and relieved” at the decision,
adding: “None of this would have been necessary if Michael had been
sensible and played fair.”
One of the judges, Lord Jonathan Sumpton, said it was not possible to
give “general guidance” following the ruling, saying the issue of
whether company assets were beneficially owned by their controller was a
“fact-specific issue”.
But family law experts said the ruling was highly significant.
“It means that business people cannot deliberately ‘hide’ their
assets in businesses and corporate structures to protect them in future
in the event of a divorce,” said Alison Hawes, a specialist family
lawyer at Irwin Mitchell.
Marilyn Stowe, senior partner of Stowe family law, said the ruling
was a “victory for common sense” and the judges had found an “ingenious
way” around existing company and family law.
Michael Hutchinson, a partner at law firm Mayer Brown, said experts
would be poring over the “extraordinary” judgement for some time to try
to understand its limits.
“The Supreme Court has handed down a landmark decision in which, for
the first time since at least the end of the 19th century, it has
accepted a general exception to the rule against ‘piercing the corporate
veil’,” he said.
The couple, both aged in their early 50s, have properties in Nigeria
and the Caribbean, and lived to a “very high standard”, according to
evidence given at hearings.
Prest claimed to be worth about £48 million (57 million euros, $75
million) but Yasmin Prest said he could have assets worth “hundreds of
millions” of pounds, the court heard.
Wednesday’s decision overturns a Court of Appeal ruling last year
that Prest did not have to hand over property to his wife. He was not in
court to hear the judgment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment